CybSafe’s CEO and founder Oz Alashe unpacks why your colleagues keep missing the point on behavioral risk – and what to do about it
Human risk management (HRM) is a modern approach to solving workforce-related cyber challenges. It uses data to identify risky behaviors in real time and applies automated, personalized interventions to reduce the likelihood and impact of cyber incidents caused by people.
Put simply: it’s about taking the guesswork out of the human side of cybersecurity.
But HRM isn’t just a technology. It’s a mindset, an approach, and a strategy. A recognition that reducing human cyber risk requires more than training, education and good intentions.
The need for HRM has emerged from a simple truth: traditional security awareness training (SAT) doesn’t go far enough. Largely because of it’s origins, primary purpose, and the baggage it carries.
SAT focuses on education and training. It’s often compliance-driven. It might raise awareness, but it often fails to change behavior and rarely reduces risk in measurable ways. HRM shifts the focus from awareness to action. From education to evidence.
This shift has been driven by five major forces:
At its core, HRM is about precision. It relies on data, often gathered from existing SaaS platforms like Microsoft 365, Slack, DLP tools, and endpoint solutions. This data provides context around what users are doing, how exposed they are, and where the risks lie.
Once risks are identified, HRM platforms intervene automatically — nudging people at the right moment, adjusting settings in the background, or escalating issues when needed. It means interventions don’t just educate — they fix.
And importantly, it means security teams spend less time chasing symptoms and more time preventing incidents.
Human risk management is not the endgame — in many ways it’s the beginning. It lays the foundation for increasingly adaptive human protection: a future where security controls anticipate risk, adapt to behavior, and protect people with little or no effort on their part.
Imagine a world where policies, processes, and tools flex automatically based on the risk posture of individual users. That’s where HRM is heading. That’s what’s needed in the AI era.
The term “human risk management” is still evolving. Even among those who accept it, there are three broad schools of thought:
Human risk management is not about replacing people with machines. It’s about augmenting people with insight. Giving security teams the data and tools to see more, do more, and fix faster.
In the age of AI-powered attacks and hyperconnected workflows, you can’t afford to treat human risk with blunt tools. HRM gives you precision. It’s the leap from telling people what to do — to actually helping them do it.
And for the first time, it gives security teams the chance to manage human risk with the same level of rigor as every other domain of cybersecurity.